Top Stories
All Sections
Finance
About
20 results for "Congress"
California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 53 into law on September 9, establishing the country's first mandatory AI audit requirements and calling on Congress to pass federal legislation.
The three most influential AI labs have been quietly meeting since July to create a shared industry AI standards organization — a self-regulation attempt before Congress forces the issue.
The FY2026 NDAA requires the Pentagon to report on a new AI cybersecurity governance framework to Congress by June 16 — and the compliance ripple effects for defense AI contractors are already beginning.
The U.S. Congress is advancing its first comprehensive AI governance framework as Colorado's AI Act takes effect June 30 — and the White House negotiates federal preemption to override state-by-state compliance fragmentation.
The White House and congressional negotiators are building a package that would federally preempt select state AI regulations in exchange for the Kids Online Safety Act and the NO FAKES Act — a deal with major implications for state-level AI governance.
OpenAI, Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and Microsoft CEOs sent Congress a joint letter demanding mandatory synthetic DNA screening — warning AI is eroding the barriers that kept bioweapons out of reach.
A bipartisan House bill would preempt state AI laws for three years while Congress drafts a federal framework. Major unions call it a giveaway to the AI industry.
Georgia, Idaho, and California enacted new AI healthcare rules in 2026 as Congress stalls — creating compliance complexity for health systems operating across state lines.
Fourteen states have active AI bills approaching May adjournment deadlines, with Connecticut's SB5 advancing and Colorado's law stayed — intensifying pressure on Congress to pass a federal preemption framework.
More than 38 states have enacted AI laws, Colorado's high-stakes AI Act takes effect June 30, and Congress still has not passed a single comprehensive AI statute — leaving courts and state AGs to fill the vacuum.
Mobile World Congress 2026 marked a decisive shift: telecom operators are done extracting value from 5G and are pivoting to AI-native networks and 6G as their primary long-term investment thesis.
Thirty-eight states have enacted AI legislation in 2026, creating a compliance patchwork that is raising costs for national businesses and building its own case for federal preemption.
Nineteen state AI bills were signed into law in April 2026 alone — bringing the year's total to 25 — as state legislatures move faster than Congress and directly challenge the White House's preemption push.
The White House wants Congress to wipe out state AI laws deemed too burdensome—and Democrats have introduced legislation to do the opposite, setting up a defining fight over who governs AI in the United States.
The Trump administration wants Congress to override state AI laws that impose undue burdens — and refuses to create any new federal AI regulator to fill the gap.
With federal AI legislation stalled, state attorneys general are deploying existing consumer protection, employment, and privacy statutes against AI companies. Colorado and Texas laws are live. A constitutional showdown over federal preemption is forming.
The White House released its National AI Policy Framework recommending that Congress preempt state AI laws in favor of a single minimally restrictive federal standard.
The White House's National Policy Framework for AI recommends Congress preempt state AI laws — setting up a defining federal-vs-state battle as 600+ AI bills advance in state legislatures.
The Trump Administration's March 20 National Policy Framework for AI recommends Congress override state AI laws, explicitly targets laws like New York's RAISE Act, and rules out any new federal AI agency — setting up a major legislative battle.
The Trump administration's National Policy Framework for AI calls on Congress to preempt state AI laws that impose undue burdens, replace 600-plus state bills with a national standard, and rely on existing agencies rather than a new federal AI regulator.