Top Stories
All Sections
Finance
About
17 results for "NIST"
Trump's June 9 AI executive order deliberately sidelines guardrails in favor of private-sector self-governance and federal preemption of state regulation, CSIS analysts warn.
Colorado's AI Act is set to take effect June 30, but compliance teams face uncertainty on two fronts: a Trump administration executive order directing DOJ to challenge state AI laws, and a state-level amendment campaign that could change the law before it takes effect.
The Trump administration is actively promoting AI clinical tools to lower healthcare costs, but physician groups and hospital networks are resisting over unresolved liability and patient safety concerns.
The Trump administration wants federal rules to preempt state AI laws, but at least 31 states are advancing their own legislation — and Colorado's law takes effect June 30, setting up a constitutional clash that could reach the Supreme Court.
Rural and community clinicians report AI documentation tools genuinely reduce administrative burden — but raise hard questions about data privacy, security liability, and automation bias in care.
President Trump abruptly postponed a prepared AI cybersecurity executive order hours before the scheduled Oval Office ceremony, raising questions about the administration's approach to AI security versus competitiveness.
National security officials invoked the Defense Production Act to compel AI developers to share safety testing results with the government — a move that contradicts the administration's deregulatory AI posture and signals an internal White House power struggle.
UW researchers find teachers are navigating AI in classrooms largely on their own, caught between students who use AI regardless of rules and administrators who have avoided clear policy.
The Trump administration is considering requiring frontier AI labs to submit safety test results to the government — a reversal driven by national security concerns over Anthropic's Mythos model.
The Trump administration is weighing an executive order to create a formal government review process for AI models before release — triggered by Anthropic's Mythos, a model the company says is too dangerous to ship publicly.
Google DeepMind, Microsoft, and xAI signed agreements with NIST to provide pre-release frontier model access to US government evaluators. All five major US AI labs are now part of the program.
UNICEF Innocenti research finds women hold 86% of jobs most exposed to AI-driven displacement — concentrated in administrative, clerical, and customer-service roles that prior automation waves left untouched.
At least 17 U.S. states are advancing bills to restrict technology in schools, pitting state legislatures against the Trump administration's push to embed AI in American classrooms.
The Trump administration announced plans to crack down on Chinese companies exploiting U.S. AI models — an escalation that lands on the same day DeepSeek released its most powerful model yet.
The Trump administration wants Congress to override state AI laws that impose undue burdens — and refuses to create any new federal AI regulator to fill the gap.
The Trump Administration's March 20 National Policy Framework for AI recommends Congress override state AI laws, explicitly targets laws like New York's RAISE Act, and rules out any new federal AI agency — setting up a major legislative battle.
The Trump administration's National Policy Framework for AI calls on Congress to preempt state AI laws that impose undue burdens, replace 600-plus state bills with a national standard, and rely on existing agencies rather than a new federal AI regulator.