Top Stories
All Sections
Finance
About
17 results for "attorneys"
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit proposed a rule requiring attorneys to certify that AI-assisted court filings have been independently human-verified — joining New York and a dozen district courts in hardening AI accountability into binding procedure.
The New York State Bar Association adopted formal AI ethics guidelines requiring attorneys to disclose AI-driven billing efficiencies, protect client confidentiality when using AI tools, and follow court disclosure rules — the most comprehensive state bar AI standards yet.
A federal appeals court ruled that attorneys bear full professional responsibility for AI-generated errors in legal filings, closing off the AI-reliance defense and awarding attorney fees against sanctioned counsel.
Nine state attorneys general filed coordinated lawsuits against OpenAI on November 2 over ChatGPT's alleged failure to protect children — the broadest state enforcement action against an AI company in U.S. history.
New York's court system issued guidance allowing attorneys to use AI in filings without disclosure while holding them fully accountable for any AI-generated errors, including hallucinated citations.
A U.S. Court of Federal Claims judge has ordered four government attorneys to explain why they should not be sanctioned for misrepresenting how the U.S. Army used AI to evaluate contract proposals — a case that goes beyond citation hallucinations into deliberate mischaracterization of AI's role.
Governor Newsom signed SB 574 requiring California attorneys to disclose AI use in court filings and personally verify every AI-generated citation, effective January 1, 2027.
California became the first state to prohibit attorneys from delegating legal work to AI, banning confidential client data from AI tools and requiring human verification of all AI-generated citations. The law takes effect January 1, 2027.
Courts are sanctioning attorneys for AI-generated citations at a rising rate, while a review of 21 jurisdictions found no uniform standard — leaving lawyers personally liable under rules that vary dramatically by state.
Checkbox launched an AI agent that reviews contracts and legal intake requests upstream of attorneys — with SAP, PepsiCo, and BILL already live on the platform.
A UK court issued a practice ban against a lawyer who submitted AI-hallucinated case citations, the first such disciplinary ruling in England and Wales — establishing that attorneys bear full professional responsibility for AI-generated content.
New York's court system codified AI rules effective June 1, 2026—attorneys may use AI to prepare filings but must independently verify submissions contain no fabricated cases or statutes.
The FTC and multiple state attorneys general are targeting AI chatbots with coordinated enforcement actions over deceptive claims and manipulative design — forcing consumer protection compliance into core product development.
The Great American AI Act's three-year moratorium on state consumer AI protections has sparked a revolt from attorneys general, consumer advocates, and labor groups who say the federal floor is too low.
Attorneys submitting AI-generated briefs with hallucinated case citations are facing mounting sanctions — while courts split on bans vs. deterrence, and law firms warn clients that chatbot use may destroy attorney-client privilege.
Major law firms are now writing AI privilege warnings into client contracts as courts sanction attorneys for AI-hallucinated citations — two converging risks the legal profession is only beginning to reckon with.
With federal AI legislation stalled, state attorneys general are deploying existing consumer protection, employment, and privacy statutes against AI companies. Colorado and Texas laws are live. A constitutional showdown over federal preemption is forming.