Top Stories
All Sections
Finance
About
7 results for "AI law"
A Manhattan federal judge ordered a defendant to hand over 31 Claude-generated documents, ruling no attorney-client privilege exists between users and commercial AI platforms — and creating a circuit split with an opposite Michigan ruling the same day.
The U.S. does not have a national AI law, and it will not have one soon. What it has instead is an accelerating patchwork of state legislation and aggressive federal agency enforcement under existing statutes — a fragmented landscape creating real compliance risk for businesses.
With federal AI legislation stalled, state attorneys general are deploying existing consumer protection, employment, and privacy statutes against AI companies. Colorado and Texas laws are live. A constitutional showdown over federal preemption is forming.
The White House released its National AI Policy Framework recommending that Congress preempt state AI laws in favor of a single minimally restrictive federal standard.
The White House's National Policy Framework for AI recommends Congress preempt state AI laws — setting up a defining federal-vs-state battle as 600+ AI bills advance in state legislatures.
The Trump Administration's March 20 National Policy Framework for AI recommends Congress override state AI laws, explicitly targets laws like New York's RAISE Act, and rules out any new federal AI agency — setting up a major legislative battle.
The Trump administration's National Policy Framework for AI calls on Congress to preempt state AI laws that impose undue burdens, replace 600-plus state bills with a national standard, and rely on existing agencies rather than a new federal AI regulator.