Top Stories
All Sections
Finance
About
19 results for "state AI law"
The White House and congressional negotiators are building a package that would federally preempt select state AI regulations in exchange for the Kids Online Safety Act and the NO FAKES Act — a deal with major implications for state-level AI governance.
Colorado's AI Act is set to take effect June 30, but compliance teams face uncertainty on two fronts: a Trump administration executive order directing DOJ to challenge state AI laws, and a state-level amendment campaign that could change the law before it takes effect.
A bipartisan House bill would preempt state AI laws for three years while Congress drafts a federal framework. Major unions call it a giveaway to the AI industry.
Colorado's Governor signed SB 189 in May 2026, stripping the state's landmark AI Act of its impact assessment requirements and pushing enforcement from June 30, 2026 to January 1, 2027 — a major win for tech industry groups.
The Trump administration wants federal rules to preempt state AI laws, but at least 31 states are advancing their own legislation — and Colorado's law takes effect June 30, setting up a constitutional clash that could reach the Supreme Court.
Colorado's AI Act becomes enforceable June 30, 2026 — the first US AI regulation to reach enforcement — requiring risk assessments and disclosures for any company deploying high-risk AI in employment, healthcare, finance, or housing.
U.S. lawmakers have introduced 1,561 AI bills across 45 states with no agreed federal standard — creating a compliance crisis for companies navigating 50 simultaneous regulatory regimes.
Connecticut's SB5 cleared both legislative chambers on May 1, 2026, establishing AI obligations around companion chatbots, automated hiring, and synthetic content — making it one of the most comprehensive state AI laws in the country.
Colorado's landmark AI accountability law takes effect June 30, 2026, and most companies that fall under it are not ready. Here is what is required and who is at risk.
Rep. Don Beyer introduced the GUARDRAILS Act to repeal Trump's AI policy framework and block federal preemption of state AI laws — setting up the defining battle over who governs AI in America.
Twenty-five U.S. states have enacted AI laws in 2026, with Colorado's Act taking effect in June — creating the most fragmented AI compliance landscape businesses have ever faced.
Colorado is considering fully repealing and reenacting its AI Act, resetting the clock to January 2027. New York's Governor has stripped the RAISE Act's most restrictive provisions in favor of transparency requirements.
The White House wants Congress to wipe out state AI laws deemed too burdensome—and Democrats have introduced legislation to do the opposite, setting up a defining fight over who governs AI in the United States.
The Trump administration wants Congress to override state AI laws that impose undue burdens — and refuses to create any new federal AI regulator to fill the gap.
The U.S. does not have a national AI law, and it will not have one soon. What it has instead is an accelerating patchwork of state legislation and aggressive federal agency enforcement under existing statutes — a fragmented landscape creating real compliance risk for businesses.
The White House released its National AI Policy Framework recommending that Congress preempt state AI laws in favor of a single minimally restrictive federal standard.
The White House's National Policy Framework for AI recommends Congress preempt state AI laws — setting up a defining federal-vs-state battle as 600+ AI bills advance in state legislatures.
The Trump Administration's March 20 National Policy Framework for AI recommends Congress override state AI laws, explicitly targets laws like New York's RAISE Act, and rules out any new federal AI agency — setting up a major legislative battle.
The Trump administration's National Policy Framework for AI calls on Congress to preempt state AI laws that impose undue burdens, replace 600-plus state bills with a national standard, and rely on existing agencies rather than a new federal AI regulator.